Not that I'm jaded or anything, but...
I think they came up with enough different stuff for Fantastic Beasts that if we hard-core HP fans walked in
(which they are counting on us stampeding to see anything with the franchise name on it and blithely toss pounds and piles of money to them) and hadn't been teased, primed, and whipped into a frenzie, their movie would have had a couple day long run with tons of bad press and maybe even boycotting.
Unlike Harry, FB wasn't a book first. Yes, there is that little "school book" she did for the fund raiser, but this movie is a story rather than a bit of fluff to raise money for a good cause. I want to think she has been boxed into corners legally and doesn't need the brain-damage of trying to "shout down the ocean" so is going along with what all those legal types want. Warner Bros., on the other hand, is just plain big business evil. They only care about their own bottom line, thus are more than likely the driving force behind controlling everything. Before they were involved she actively encouraged kids to read and fan fiction to be written, plus she used The HP Lexicon herself to make sure her facts were straight. WB grabs onto making movies that use the name and
some of the ideas, let all of what JKR and fans created keep on for the first couple movies (they were testing the waters - and looked at all of us as cash cows they didn't want to spook away from providing their profits). Once they figured out we were "easy", WB dropped all pretense of having any respect for us or JKR's art... which is when the suing and threats of law suits and general bad vibes took over.
I am willing to see lots of changes and have to compartmentalize the way we did with the Star Treks. Someone who defined Star Trek by the original one would have a heck of a time accepting the differences in Next Gen or DS9 or Enterprise or even the movies - so there's a bit of mental gymnastics to allowing stories that different to carry the sacred moniker. Almost all of us got to the point of liking at least one of the newer ones far better than the original (at the very least the special effects and make up were MUCH improved over the Shatner/Nimoy ST). So I am willing to keep this separate from kids at Hogwarts, but still retain the established tenants of magical worlds and strange creatures... I really do want some info so the clash of concepts is softened somewhat... But I also have no illusions that the four articles above are anything other than completely promotional Vaseline.
That said,
1. The names she's chosen seem to be charactertures of names that might exist on this side of The Pond. It is somewhat justified with the backstory of magical people emigrating to North America, but they are even a tad outrageous for brought-over-European-names. (But I probably thought that of ones like Scrimgeour when I first saw them, too... so not sure how much of that thought is valid and how much is Xenophobic of me.)
2.
Quote:
being ‘a Dorcus’ was slang for an idiot or inept person
...Its cleverly working in a bit of American slang. Being a Dork...
3. Its cool how the Beauvais wands, with their "hair of the rougarou, the dangerous dog-headed monster that prowled Louisiana swamps", are like the Dragon Heartstrings wands of Ollivanders' and the other European wand makers, tend to be drawn/used more to the Dark Side. Then it says that a lot of powerful-not-necessarily-negative witches and wizards also have them, as with the Dragon Heartstrings ones. (Hermione's has Dragon Heartstring core, but so does Bella's, Lucius', and even Ollivander's own.) So there is some consistency in the workings of magic on both Continents.
4. I like the concept and acronym of MACUSA better than Ministry of/for Magic, but only because I grew up with the concept of the governing body being a Congress rather than a Parliament. They all do the same thing, but, back to Xenophobia, its what I'm more familiar with... automatic pilot.
.